Prabowo Team Critics Verdict About Letter Of Regional Head

MASSAPEDIA NEWS - Prabowo-Hatta's attorney criticized the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK), which rejected the claim about the alleged circulation of an invitation letter from the Head of Region for voting Jokowi-JK. The invitation letter was made by the Governor of Central Java, Ganjar Pranowo, and Agustin Teras Narang, who served as Governor of Central Kalimantan.

"Matters relating to (the case) it still can be done through other legal channels," said Didi Supriyanto, attorney Prabowo-Hatta when interviewed after the trial verdict, in the Court Building, Jakarta, Thursday (21/8), night ,

Didi regretted that the violation of the election administration be structured as it involves the Regional Head.

However, the Chairman of the General Elections Commission (KPU) has denied it has carried out under the pretext of accountability at various levels. "The Court has given judgment, and all arguments acquitted," said Husni Kamil Manik, Chairman of the Commission, when met at the Court House, on Thursday (21/8).

Earlier, the Constitutional Court (MK) decided allegations of emphasis and encouragement of Regional Head is not the realm of the court. "If it turns out there is a violation of law, it is outside the authority of the Court," the judge said Patrialis Akbar in the trial verdict lawsuit in the Court, yesterday.

He added that although the Governor of Central Java are cadres PDIP, Jokowi bearer party, but it is not the Court's authority to impose sanctions to the governor on the deployment of the solicitation letter. Moreover, when the applicant, attorney Prabowo-Hatta, can not attach written proof that the letter in question.

As for the case in Central Kalimantan, Agustin Terras Narang spreading his invitation letter by using the position as President of the National Indigenous Dayak. "A little hard to separate the position as Governor of Central Kalimantan, with the President of the National Indigenous Dayak. However, here the applicant also can not provide evidence of the letter in court, "said Patrialis.