Perludem: Basic of lawsuit Prabowo in MK is Weak

Society for Elections and Democracy (Perludem) assess the fundamentals of presidential-vice lawsuit camp number one Prabowo-Hatta Rajasa weak and should be much improved. In fact, Perludem found the demands of even undercut other demands.

For example, Prabowo-Hatta camp demanded that his side should have won the 2014 presidential election with a certain number of votes. However, there is also the demand that carried out re-voting.

"Demand PSU indicate the alleged systematic, structured, and massive so (supposedly) the results of the election are unknown numbers," Titi said in a press conference in Jakarta, Thursday (7/8).

In addition, the Prabowo-Hatta also cited violations of election in 10 provinces without accompanying arguments and data. Another gaffe is not the inclusion of 15 provinces in the petition to the demands so that it becomes irrelevant.

Advocacy team Prabowo-Hatta also judged less meticulous linking alleged fraud was found with the final outcome of the election. "For example, in the alleged violations related to the right to vote DPKTb, the applicant immediately claimed the policy was wrong and asked for another candidate reduced sound or sound is added to the applicant," Titi said. In fact, harm DPKTb administration does not automatically mean no sound is missing.

Therefore, Titi suggest Prabowo team-Hatta in order to correct the petition granted in accordance with the advice of judges on Wednesday (6/8) yesterday. "Then, they have to prove fraud in the form of the use of double voting rights or fictitious voters, particularly related to DPKTb argument," said Titi.

Deputy Director Perludem Veri Junaidi looked Prabowo-Hatta camp will not be able to win a lawsuit if there is no correction to the application. Prabowo team-Hatta must submit sufficient witnesses and evidence is strong. "They can then build a strong legal argument that their demand be granted," said Veri.